Skip to content

#288 | “Without emergency exit” (from rioter.info)

 

An article published at the Rioters Agency on the May 5th events

 

 

WITHOUT EMERGENCY EXIT
On May 5th demonstration and the three dead Marfin bank employees

To the strikers that are still smashing shit up

It is indeed inappropriate to “put the entire responsibility” and blame on Mr. Vgenopoulos for the depressing deaths of the three employees of the burnt Marfin bank. The fact that he forced his employees under threat of dismissal to remain locked in the upper floor offices of a seemingly empty and unprotected bank, without any fire protection or emergency exits, in the epicentre of the greatest strike demonstration of the last thirty years, was not just another criminal negligence on the altar of profit [1], that his class has got us used to. This conscious use of workers as a human shield for banks and businesses [2] is one of the boss class’s responses to December and the common violence of insurrection that spreads, de-legalising and destroying the circulation of commodities, breaking and torching vehicles, shops, its police guards and most of all its headquarters: the banks.

To be clear, the intention of Vgenopoulos and his class to sacrifice a few workers in order to block the process followed by insurrections up until now, must be answered as such. Legal points or leftist evasions such as: insurrection means storming the parliament and not the banks/shops, having no idea what they’d do there of course, do nothing more than refuse to address the issue.

You see, it is common for a boss to know better what his interests are and how to pursue them, than the workers do. And any boss always knows that “we’re at war”, even if they’ll never cry it out openly, as these naive people that think that in a war it is ok to hit but once challenged one should rely on an intervention of an allegedly neutral justice. By setting ourselves (or other workers) under the tutelage of the state, we recuperate even the most extreme act into nothing more than violent reformism. The only justice in the streets, to the degree they are under our power, is us. The responsibility for whatever happens there, who lives and who dies, is ours: PROLETARIAN DICTATORSHIP period. If we lack – other than an effective guard of strikes that wouldn’t leave any colleague in the hands of the bosses – an essential trust among us, a trust manufactured through our common experiences in struggles and meeting in the streets, then the next step will be to call the police ourselves in our demonstrations, for them to be in charge and bear responsibility for whatever happens. WHOEVER CARRIES VIOLENCE, FORCES JUSTICE. To perform violence, ignoring the “sense of right” it comes with, to bring – abstract – chaos, doesn’t promote anything other than the highest organized structures, that come with their own ferroconcrete plan of “justice” (the Stalinists, the police, the mafia, the parastate groups…). Victory belongs to those who bring chaos WITHOUT CARRYING IT INSIDE THEM.

Fetishising insurrection as the destructive act itself, represented a past phase of our movement, weak and marginal at the time, though after December, and the stripping of every fetish from violence with its simultaneous open communisation, must now be overcome. A second December would no longer be a victory but a defeat. Any related invocation, shows nothing more than a complete lack of any plan for afterwards. Our enemy has advanced, we are forced to do the same if we are not to disappear from the historical scene.

We must not sit home to be disciplined by their TV programs as if we were naughty children given too much leash. We must retake Logos (speech) back to the streets. Spit on the bourgeois and TV justice that “vindicates” the pain of one with the suffering of another, accumulating misery for all and socializing their cannibalism. The most retarded of these vultures, before they ascertained how the three employees’ deaths would paralyze us, were trying to make us feel guilty for a bunch of ridiculous things, from the expected fall in the tourist trade to the country’s image abroad. To make us feel guilty for fighting. To divide us into “peaceful workers” and “hooded criminals with molotovs”, now that everyone knows (except of course the Communist Party that only saw provocators) that on 5/5 there were no peaceful workers that didn’t stand up – with or without hoods and molotovs, no importance – to the State’s last playing card: its police terror.

Their justice devours blood, the blood of the offenders, of anyone that resembles them, or most of all the anarchists, since it is they that generously have given their flag to any insurrectionary violence of even the most isolated elements of our class, globally [3]. But, it wants something more than that. It wants to open as a larger trauma to the social memory, that would break our familiarization with our own violence, with the violence of our struggle, with its subjects and the communication among them. Our justice will deal with nothing other than the healing. We don’t know what kind of persons the dead were, if their sense of dignity would cope with the fascist scum and the TV vultures mongering their deaths or not, but we are sure that as workers their interests were with the victory of our struggle, with all the workers of Europe and the World. We won’t drag one another down – we will rise together:

GENERAL WILDCAT STRIKE!

Let’s embrace the occupations!
Let’s stay in the streets!
Let’s talk!

2 of the 200.000 provocators

***

***

[1] For the time, let’s bear this in mind : 36,1% pure rise in profits for Marfin bank this year, in the middle of the “most harsh crisis” to which every worker must reconcile working and obeying in the name of the nation.

[2] Similar incidents with that of Marfin bank on 23, Stadiou street, proceded to Bazaar supermarket behind Omonoia square, where a worker from inside put out the fire with an extinguisher, and Ianos bookstore that was open (as it is known, culture merchandising doesn’t give a fuck about strikes).

[3] The night of 5/5, armed gangs of Delta, Zeta, plainclothes cops and riot police stormed the squat of “anarchists for a polymorphic movement” on Zaimi street, the Immigrants Haunt on Tsamadou street, and many houses and cafes at Exarchia, beating and intimidating people. In the same time on the TV, everyone was more or less asking for the anarchists’ heads.

***

***

[Thanks to J. and S. for correcting this translation. Greek version: click here.]

14 Comments

  1. qrewgryt wrote:

    “PROLETARIAN DICTATORSHIP”

    W-h-a-t t-h-e f-u-c-k ?!

    Tuesday, May 11, 2010 at 2:04 pm | Permalink
  2. sab cat wrote:

    why “wtf?”?. they seem to be marxist, probably even leninist. proletarian dictatorship is the historical consequence of capitalism speaking in terms of historical materialism.

    as an anarchist i would prefer taking over the producation and organizing in syndicates without the dictatorship, but thats up to the comrades in greece…

    a las barricadas!

    Tuesday, May 11, 2010 at 5:05 pm | Permalink
  3. Debris wrote:

    IMO, the concept of “proletarian dictatorship” doesn’t necessarily imply a political dictatorship, which of course is how marxist-leninists have understood it.

    Workers directly taking possession of essential forces of production and distribution, without any party or union mediation, might also be dubbed (an antipolitical) dictatorship of the proletariat.

    Whatever we should call it, this period may be necessary in order to safely dismantle nuclear powerplants, chemical factories and other hazardous installations (the spectre of a transitional period is haunting the anarchist movement…)

    The burden of history may of course render the concept of dictatorship unusable, unless you insist on trying to reclaim concepts that have been used ‘wrongly’ in the past. Whether this is reasonable or not, I cannot say.

    Tuesday, May 11, 2010 at 5:44 pm | Permalink
  4. qrewgryt wrote:

    Ok, Occupied London, why the fuck did you close comments to that Flesh Machine text? What the fuck?

    Wednesday, May 12, 2010 at 4:11 pm | Permalink
  5. David Cameron wrote:

    I say chaps! This is jolly well not on, what!?

    Wednesday, May 12, 2010 at 4:54 pm | Permalink
  6. admin wrote:

    @qrewgryt: because the authors have requested that there are no comments under their text as they’ll not be able to respond. We respect that. Cheers ;)

    Wednesday, May 12, 2010 at 5:54 pm | Permalink
  7. WEAK wrote:

    though the comments aren’t published just to get a reply from the authors but also to take the conversation one step forwards. If a communicationn with the authors was demanded, one could send them an e-mail, but I didn’t notice any such comment asking anything from the writers. Also, I don’t think any other Greek groups reply here often, so this isn’t apparently what the comments are for. Bring back the comments!

    Wednesday, May 12, 2010 at 7:54 pm | Permalink
  8. INCUBUS wrote:

    Sorry ADMIN, but this is neither coherant nor consistant as some posts still have their comments, some don’t. Either way, any group that puts out a statement must expect them to be debated, online or in bars, squats,frontrooms, wherever. Where does the right of reply end and the right to free debate begin? If they were that bothered, they may have well kept quiet. Our desire to debate is stymied by their apparent inability to communicate -even if there are linguistic difficulties- with their ‘audience’. Is this just ideological haughtiness or what? Ridiculous.

    Wednesday, May 12, 2010 at 8:41 pm | Permalink
  9. interesting wrote:

    and, in all honesty, I could guess that the comments above would be coming from N. Americans/ W. Europeans.

    From what I know, the Greek anarchist scene has a much more “precautionary” relationship to the internet. On Athens IMC, for example, there is an option for groups to publish their communiques WITHOUT comments.

    Thursday, May 13, 2010 at 5:08 am | Permalink
  10. WEAK wrote:

    nop, I m actually from Eastern Europe. So What? Is this a reason not to come with the comments again? this isn’t respectful for the ppl writing here..

    Thursday, May 13, 2010 at 11:04 am | Permalink
  11. WEAK wrote:

    an other thing. I noticed this communique (the rioter.info one) was deleted from anarkismo.net, anybody knows why did that happen?

    Thursday, May 13, 2010 at 11:07 am | Permalink
  12. huh? wrote:

    was it online and now it’s gone? are you sure?

    Thursday, May 13, 2010 at 2:57 pm | Permalink
  13. WEAK wrote:

    nop, sorry about that, it was another post, and probably my browser’s fault.

    Thursday, May 13, 2010 at 10:32 pm | Permalink
  14. did wrote:

    TOUT LE POUVOIR AUX COMMUNES

    Friday, May 14, 2010 at 7:32 pm | Permalink

One Trackback/Pingback

  1. [...] “Without emergency exit” (Rioters Agency) [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*
*